Unapologetic Reviews

Diana Wynne Jones ’s Howl ’s Moving Castle and Studio Ghibli ’s film adaptation are not simply different versions of the same story. They are different stories built from some of the same names, images, and character outlines. The film keeps Sophie , Howl, Calcifer , the moving castle, and the basic premise of Sophie being cursed into old age, but beyond that it changes characterisation, worldbuilding, plot structure, antagonists, and the entire central conflict. This is a spoiler comparison of both versions. Sophie’s character In the book, Sophie is much stronger, sharper, and more active. She begins as someone who has quietly accepted a limited life. She assumes that, as the eldest of three sisters in a fairy tale world, she is destined to fail. But once she is cursed, she becomes far more direct. She talks back. She interferes. She makes decisions. She does not simply drift through events. She pushes into them. She is also magically powerful, though she does not know it for most of ...

Howl’s Moving Castle is a film adaptation produced by Studio Ghibli and directed by Hayao Miyazaki . It is one of the studio’s most well known films and is often noted for its visual style and animation quality. The film runs for approximately two hours and begins with a relatively slow introduction. The early part of the story focuses on establishing the main characters, particularly Sophie and Howl, as well as the setting. Sophie is shown in her everyday life before the curse, and the audience is introduced to the moving castle . One of the strongest aspects of the film is its visual design. The world is presented with a strong steampunk influence , including airships, mechanical structures, and industrial elements integrated into the landscape. The moving castle itself is a complex, shifting structure made up of multiple parts, and it plays a central role in the film’s visual identity. The countryside, towns, and interiors are all highly detailed, and the animation consistently su...

I've listened to the abridged audiobook version of Doctor Who: The Resurrection Casket by Justin Richards . The story is sort of interesting. Now the audiobook is abridged, so maybe it's better if I read the whole book, but I had some problems with it. On the one hand I felt that the parts on the planet were very hurried, while the part in space is a lot more detailed. It was also too much running about, and ended up not being all that interesting in the long run. Some elements of the steampunk aspect were nicely used, like when only steam was available or not, but otherwise it seemed a bit forced. The mystery element played out nicely, and the overall story was okay. It just wasn't as exciting as it could have been. The reading by David Tennant was brilliant as always. Even the way he emulated the steam coming out from the robots was effortless, and sounded genuine. The original characters didn't make much of an impact on me. Perhaps the ones that I ...