Emma by Jane Austen * * * * *
At its core, Emma is a social comedy about confidence curdling into arrogance. Emma Woodhouse is twenty one, wealthy, clever, and comfortably installed as the centre of her small community. She is unmarried, not particularly interested in changing that, and sees herself as a benevolent organiser of other people’s lives. She holds court. People defer to her. She assumes she understands everyone better than they understand themselves. It is the perfect setup for mistakes, and Austen wastes no time letting Emma make them.
Emma’s self appointed role as matchmaker gives the novel its momentum. She is convinced she has a gift for arranging other people’s futures, partly because she has had a few early successes. Enter Harriet Smith, young, impressionable, and illegitimate. Emma takes one look at Harriet’s vague background and decent education and decides she must be the hidden daughter of a gentleman. From there, Emma constructs an entire imaginary destiny for her. What follows is not cruelty in the obvious sense, but something more uncomfortable: well meaning interference powered by class blindness and overconfidence. Emma does not intend harm, but intention is not the point. The damage still happens.
The most complicated part of the novel, for me as a modern reader, is Mr. Knightley. He is thirty seven to Emma’s twenty one. Sixteen years older. More educated. More experienced. Socially equal, yes, but not truly balanced. He positions himself as her moral corrector, and while the narrative clearly wants us to trust him, the dynamic often feels unpleasant. He criticises Emma repeatedly, sometimes rightly, sometimes smugly, and when he is correct he makes sure she knows it. There is no real humility there, no sense that he might also be limited or wrong. He never really learns in the way Emma is forced to learn.
What bothered me most was not simply the age gap, but the tone of authority it creates. Emma is chastised for ignorance that is almost inevitable given her age and gender in that society. Knightley’s role is framed as guidance, but it often feels like condescension. He seems designed as a moral anchor, perhaps even a Darcy-like figure, yet he lacks Darcy’s self doubt and capacity for change. When he finally softens, it feels less like growth and more like permission granted. As a result, the central relationship never quite sat right with me, no matter how charming the surrounding comedy is.
The supporting cast, however, is classic Austen fun. Reverend Elton is once again an unsympathetic clergyman, which continues to make me wonder what Austen had against vicars as a group. He is vain, socially ambitious, and spectacularly self interested. Other characters fill out the social world nicely, each representing a different kind of blindness, politeness, or quiet resilience. This is a novel deeply interested in how people misread one another, and how certainty can be far more dangerous than ignorance.
Despite my reservations, Emma is genuinely delightful. It is sharp, observant, and often very funny. The audio drama format amplified that humour and kept the social scenes lively, which helped enormously. Emma herself is a fascinating protagonist: flawed, intelligent, capable of growth, and forced to confront the consequences of her assumptions. I just wish the novel had extended that same scrutiny to Mr. Knightley.
I do recommend Emma, especially if you enjoy character driven stories and social satire. It is Austen at her most confident and playful. But it is also a reminder that not every romantic resolution ages gracefully. Emma learns. The world adjusts around her. Mr. Knightley, frustratingly, remains exactly who he always was.
Comments
Post a Comment